UpGuard alternatives · 2026

The best UpGuard alternatives in 2026, compared honestly.

UpGuard is the easiest place to start in this category, so most teams searching for UpGuard alternatives are not starting — they are growing. The supplier count has outrun the Standard tier, or the work around the platform has outrun the team. This guide compares seven UpGuard alternatives and competitors for 2026, including RiskXchange, which publishes this page.

Last reviewed 13 October 2026 by Darren Craig

The short answer

Growing past 50 suppliers on a budget: RiskXchange — published tiers for 50 and 150 vendors, and an unlimited-vendor subscription from £75,000 a year.
Need the work done, not just tracked: RiskXchange, whose AI agents pre-populate questionnaires, chase suppliers and build the reports.
Need a board-recognised rating: Bitsight or SecurityScorecard.
Already automating your own SOC 2: Vanta.

What UpGuard does well

UpGuard is genuinely good self-serve. It publishes a price for its entry tier, onboards without a sales cycle, and combines outside-in monitoring with security questionnaires in a clean interface. For a small team starting a programme this month, it is a strong default.

Why teams look for UpGuard alternatives

The reasons that come up most often when buyers re-open the shortlist.

Outgrowing the published tier
UpGuard’s Standard plan is $1,750 a month billed annually for 50 vendors, with extra vendors at $79 a month each. Professional (150), Corporate (500) and Enterprise+ (unlimited) are quoted, so the price past the entry tier is a negotiation.
Per-vendor overage prices growth
A per-vendor model charges for the behaviour a programme is trying to encourage — bringing more suppliers into scope.
The chasing still lands on the team
Sending questionnaires is easy; getting them back, reading the evidence and following up findings is where the hours go. Teams look for a platform that does that part.

UpGuard alternatives at a glance

RiskXchange first — we publish this page — then the rest alphabetically. The same platforms are compared side by side in our buyer’s guide.

Platform	Best for	Pricing
RiskXchange	Teams short of people; AI agents do the questionnaire, chasing and reporting work	Published, all three tiers; unlimited vendors on Enterprise
Bitsight	Board-recognised security ratings	Quoted
Panorays	Assessment workflow with outside-in context	Quoted
Prevalent (Mitratech)	Off-the-shelf assessment content beyond cyber	Quoted
SecurityScorecard	Ratings your customers already know	Quoted
Vanta	Teams already automating SOC 2 or ISO 27001 in Vanta	Quoted
Whistic	Trust-centre exchange and AI-assisted assessments	Quoted

The UpGuard alternatives, one by one

What each is strongest at, and the question to put to each in a demo.

RiskXchange Our product

Best for: Teams that need the third-party risk work done without hiring more people to do it.

Most platforms on this list give your analysts better tools. RiskXchange gives you The Agency — 32 AI agents in five teams that do the work a TPRM team would otherwise hire for, while your people review and decide. ARIA pre-populates questionnaires from the documents a supplier already has and cross-checks every answer against REX’s outside-in scan evidence. NOVA runs supplier outreach and chasing by email, WhatsApp and in-app chat, and finds the new contact when the old one has left. TARA tiers suppliers and drives remediation to deadline. VANCE produces DORA, NIS2 and board reports from live data. Autonomy is set supplier by supplier, so a critical supplier can need sign-off on every action while a low-risk one runs hands-off.

Strengths

Capacity scales with your supplier count, not your headcount
Unlimited-vendor subscription on Enterprise — adding suppliers does not add cost
Questionnaire answers and outside-in evidence on the same supplier record, cross-checked automatically
Supplier follow-up run by an agent, not a reminder email
Published pricing, unlimited seats, no setup fees

Ask in the demo

Bring a real SOC 2 report and a supplier who has gone quiet: watch ARIA pre-populate the questionnaire and NOVA pick up the chase, on your data.
Put your current analyst hours next to our published price, and model year three on unlimited vendors.

Pricing: All three annual tiers published: Essentials £14,900 a year (50 vendors), Professional £31,500 a year (150 vendors) and Enterprise from £75,000 a year (unlimited vendors). GBP, excluding VAT. See pricing.

Bitsight

Best for: Programmes where an external security score must carry weight with a board or regulator.

The best-known name in security ratings, with a long time series of outside-in data and a vendor risk management product built around it.

Strengths

Board-recognised ratings with long historical depth
Breadth of outside-in telemetry
Widely referenced in insurance and board reporting

Ask in the demo

How much of the questionnaire and remediation workflow is native, and how mature is it next to the ratings product?
How does price scale as the number of monitored vendors grows?

Pricing: Quoted; generally at the higher end for comparable vendor counts.

Panorays

Best for: Teams whose bottleneck is the assessment process rather than outside-in coverage.

Combines questionnaire-led assessment with an outside-in view of each supplier, with an emphasis on tailoring the questionnaire to the relationship.

Strengths

Assessment workflow designed around the supplier relationship
Questionnaire and external view in one product

Ask in the demo

Are assessments metered separately from monitored vendors?
How is the questionnaire answer checked against the external evidence — automatically, or by your analyst?

Pricing: Quoted; ask whether assessments are metered separately.

Prevalent (Mitratech)

Best for: Programmes that want assessment content off the shelf, or that span more than cyber.

Breadth of assessment content. Its own figure is 800+ pre-built assessment templates mapped to frameworks including ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA, SOC 2 and SIG, with third-party risk that reaches into financial health, ESG, sanctions and adverse media. Its Vendor Threat Monitor watches those signals continuously, and its FastTrack Assessment uses AI to suggest answers from a supplier’s previously completed questionnaires. Acquired by Mitratech in October 2024.

Strengths

Very large template library
Continuous monitoring across financial, ESG, regulatory and reputational signal
Risk domains well beyond information security

Ask in the demo

Prevalent does not produce a security rating of its own — how is a supplier’s answer checked against its externally observable posture?
How are assessments metered?
What does the Mitratech acquisition mean for the roadmap and for your renewal?

Pricing: Quoted.

SecurityScorecard

Best for: Teams whose customers and partners already use SecurityScorecard ratings.

An established security ratings platform with broad ecosystem familiarity, plus supply-chain monitoring and assessment features built around the score.

Strengths

Ratings widely recognised, which shortens conversations with suppliers
Large ecosystem of integrations

Ask in the demo

How does price scale with vendors monitored and modules added?
What is the process when a supplier disputes its score?

Pricing: Quoted; scales with vendors monitored and modules.

Vanta

Best for: Companies already automating SOC 2 or ISO 27001 in Vanta that want vendor reviews in the same place.

A compliance automation platform with a vendor risk management module: AI that extracts findings from SOC 2 reports, DPAs and questionnaires, vendor discovery for shadow IT, and inherent and residual risk scoring.

Strengths

One platform for your own compliance and your vendors’
AI-assisted review of vendor evidence
Vendor discovery from your own systems

Ask in the demo

Is vendor risk an add-on to your framework package, and how is it priced?
How does it handle hundreds of critical suppliers in a regulated programme, rather than a SaaS stack?

Pricing: Quoted; third-party reports describe vendor risk as a separately priced add-on.

Whistic

Best for: Teams that want suppliers to share security profiles once, rather than answer every questionnaire.

Built around a trust-centre exchange where companies publish their security documentation for reuse, with AI-assisted assessment. It added native breach monitoring (Vendor Monitoring) in March 2026.

Strengths

Exchange of pre-published vendor profiles
AI-assisted questionnaire review
Useful on both sides — buying and being assessed

Ask in the demo

How many of your suppliers already publish a Whistic profile?
How mature is the 2026 monitoring capability next to established ratings providers?

Pricing: Quoted.

RiskXchange vs UpGuard

Where the two genuinely differ.

	RiskXchange	UpGuard
Getting started	Published prices for all three tiers; free trial available	Self-serve, published entry tier
Questionnaires	ARIA pre-populates questionnaires from SOC 2 reports, certificates and policies against 157 universal controls	Questionnaire library and workflow
Answer vs evidence	Every answer cross-checked against our own outside-in rating; contradictions raised as findings	Ask how a questionnaire answer is checked against the external scan
Supplier chasing	NOVA chases by email, WhatsApp and in-app chat, and finds the new contact when one leaves	Ask what is automated
Pricing at 50 vendors	£14,900 a year	$1,750 a month billed annually ($21,000 a year)
Pricing at 150 vendors and beyond	£31,500 a year for 150; unlimited vendors from £75,000. Unlimited seats, no setup fees	Professional, Corporate and Enterprise+ quoted

UpGuard’s figures are from its own pricing page, in US dollars, as recorded on our pricing comparison; ours are published list prices in GBP, excluding VAT. Confirm both directly before budgeting.

The cost that decides it: software or headcount

Whichever platform you choose, the biggest line in a third-party risk budget is usually the people running it — sending and chasing questionnaires, reading SOC 2 reports, following up findings, building the board pack. Most platforms make that work faster and leave it with your team, and most price per supplier monitored, so cost rises with every supplier you add.

RiskXchange is built to take that work off the team. The Agency — 32 AI agents in five teams — pre-populates questionnaires from the evidence a supplier already holds, cross-checks every answer against our own outside-in rating, chases suppliers by email, WhatsApp and in-app chat, and produces the DORA, NIS2 and board reports from live data. Your analysts review the exceptions and make the calls. Enterprise covers unlimited vendors from £75,000 a year, so capacity grows with the supply chain while the cost stays flat. Put your own figures into the business-case estimator.

When UpGuard is still the right choice

You monitor fewer than 50 suppliers and expect to stay there.
Your team has the time to run questionnaires and follow-up itself, and you value UpGuard’s interface.

Switching from UpGuard

Most teams run both platforms in parallel for one assessment cycle rather than cut over on a single day.

Export your supplier register
Take the supplier list, tiers and owners out of UpGuard as a CSV. Suppliers are added to RiskXchange manually or by CSV upload.
Bring the evidence you already hold
SOC 2 reports, ISO 27001 certificates, completed SIG or CAIQ questionnaires and policies. ARIA maps them to 157 universal controls and pre-populates each supplier’s questionnaire, so suppliers review rather than start again.
Set autonomy supplier by supplier
Choose manual, assisted or autonomous for each supplier — sign-off on every action for critical suppliers, hands-off for low-risk ones.
Run one cycle in parallel, then cut over
Compare findings for the same suppliers on both platforms through one renewal or assessment cycle, then retire the old one at its renewal date.

Disclosure

RiskXchange publishes this page and sells one of the products on it, which is why we are listed first. We have described UpGuard and the other alternatives from their own materials and public announcements, phrased our reservations as questions to ask them, and said where UpGuard remains the better choice. Check what matters to you against a source we did not write.

Questions

UpGuard alternatives, answered.

What is the best UpGuard alternative?

For a growing programme, RiskXchange — published prices at 50 and 150 vendors, an unlimited-vendor tier, and AI agents that do the questionnaire and chasing work. For a board-recognised rating, Bitsight or SecurityScorecard. For companies automating their own SOC 2, Vanta.

Is there an UpGuard alternative with unlimited vendors?

UpGuard’s unlimited tier, Enterprise+, is quoted. RiskXchange publishes its unlimited-vendor Enterprise subscription from £75,000 a year, with unlimited seats and no setup fees.

Who are UpGuard’s main competitors?

Bitsight, SecurityScorecard, Panorays and RiskXchange in security ratings; Vanta for companies managing vendor risk alongside their own compliance; Whistic and Prevalent for assessment-led programmes.

Can we move our supplier data from UpGuard to RiskXchange?

Yes. Export the supplier register as a CSV and upload it; bring the evidence you already hold — SOC 2 reports, certificates, completed questionnaires — and ARIA pre-populates each supplier’s questionnaire from it. Most teams run both platforms for one cycle before cutting over at renewal.

Does RiskXchange produce its own security ratings?

Yes. RiskXchange is TPRM software that generates its own outside-in ratings, so a supplier’s questionnaire answers and its external posture sit on the same record and are checked against each other — where they disagree, the gap is raised as a finding.

Keep comparing